Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 74 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 660 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.61 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 269 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |