Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mini Countryman 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 65 HP more power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mini Countryman. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 720 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Mini Cooper | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 8 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler has 209 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |