Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 13 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 409 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |