Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Jeep Wrangler 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2007 is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler 2007 engine produces 34 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler 2002, whereas torque is 195 NM more than Jeep Wrangler 2002. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler 2007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler 2007 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler 2002, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler 2007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler 2007 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Wrangler 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2007 is larger. Jeep Wrangler 2007 is 28 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler 2002, 19 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler 2007 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1045 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2002 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler 2007 has 179 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler 2002. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler 2007 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler 2007 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |