Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 296 NM | 318 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 13.8 | |
| Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 37 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1303 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`064 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |