Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 95 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 570 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 45 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 266 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 425 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |