Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 44 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |