Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 61 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 215 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 94 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 26 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |