Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Jeep Wrangler 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2007 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler 2002 engine produces 34 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler 2007, whereas torque is 195 NM less than Jeep Wrangler 2007. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler 2002 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler 2002 could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler 2002 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler 2007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Wrangler 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2002 is smaller. Jeep Wrangler 2002 is 28 cm shorter than the Jeep Wrangler 2007, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler 2002 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 141 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1045 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2002 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler 2002 has 179 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler 2007. The Jeep Wrangler 2007 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler 2002 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler 2007. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |