Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 296 NM | 295 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 13 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 1 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 16.0 | |
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
620 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.88 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 73 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`425 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 12 600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |