Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 86 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 244 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 101 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |