Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 32 HP less power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.2 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 620 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota 4-Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 66 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 1263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1515 litres | 2257 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 948 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 742 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 2`381 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |