Jeep Wrangler 1987 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 3 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 9 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 11.4 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 37 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 965 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1223 litres | 2010 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 611 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 787 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |