Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 41 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler and Jeep Grand Cherokee are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.05 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |