Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Lexus RX 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 100 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 64 NM more than Lexus RX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.6 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.69 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 1 cm longer than the Lexus RX, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.85 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Lexus RX has
| |