Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 68 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Wrangler is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 3`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |