Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 41 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 68 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.56 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 27 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 630 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1602 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |