Jeep Wrangler 2003 vs Jeep Wrangler 2007

 
Jeep Wrangler
2003 - 2006
Jeep Wrangler
2007 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 147 HP177 HP
Torque: 224 NM410 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds10.3 seconds
Jeep Wrangler 2007 is a more dynamic driving.
Jeep Wrangler 2003 engine produces 30 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler 2007, whereas torque is 186 NM less than Jeep Wrangler 2007. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.49.7
The Jeep Wrangler 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jeep Wrangler 2003 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler 2003 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway800 km on highway
Jeep Wrangler 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 3.95 m4.22 m
Width: 1.68 m1.87 m
Height: 1.75 m1.80 m
Jeep Wrangler 2003 is smaller.
Jeep Wrangler 2003 is 28 cm shorter than the Jeep Wrangler 2007, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler 2003 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres141 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1045 litresno data
Jeep Wrangler 2003 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler 2003 has 179 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler 2007. The Jeep Wrangler 2007 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler 2003 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler 2007.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 980024 800
Pros and Cons: Jeep Wrangler has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Jeep Wrangler has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv