Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 199 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 410 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 11.2 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.6 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 30 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 415 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`374 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |