Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Jeep Wrangler 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 4.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 199 HP | 143 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 410 NM | 215 - 296 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 11.2 seconds | 9.9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.6 | 10.4 - 14.5 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2007 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Wrangler 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2007 is larger. Jeep Wrangler 2007 is 28 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler 2002, 19 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler 2007 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1303 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler 2002 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Wrangler 2007 has 179 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler 2002. This could mean that the Jeep Wrangler 2007 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler 2007 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`374 | ~ 2`032 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |