Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Subaru Forester 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 4.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 177 HP | 158 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 - 296 NM | 186 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13 seconds | 6 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 14.5 | 9.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 53 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 387 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1303 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 67 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`032 | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru Forester has
| |