Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.4 - 3.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 177 HP | 147 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 - 296 NM | 224 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 14.1 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 - 14.7 | 9.9 - 14.6 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 62 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1565 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 2`784 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |