Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 236 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Renegade engine produces 6 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 16 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 58 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Chrysler 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Renegade might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Renegade is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Renegade is 30 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Renegade has 238 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 372 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Renegade can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Renegade is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Renegade scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |