Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Ford EcoSport 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Renegade engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Renegade consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Renegade could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Renegade consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Renegade has 4x4: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Jeep Renegade is 2 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1238 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Renegade has 18 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The Ford EcoSport may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Renegade (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Renegade is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Renegade scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |