Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Renegade engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Renegade is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Renegade consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Jeep Renegade over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Renegade consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Renegade is smaller. Jeep Renegade is 32 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Renegade has 238 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 372 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Renegade can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Renegade is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Renegade scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |