Jeep Compass 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 40 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite the higher power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi ASX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Compass engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is larger. Jeep Compass is 17 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Compass is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Jeep Compass has 39 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Jeep Compass can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |