Jeep Compass 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 170 HP | 136 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 10.7 seconds | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 8.6 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
|
Jeep Compass petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Jeep Compass equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass and Ford Kuga are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 82 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`918 | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |