Jeep Commander 2006 vs Land Rover Discovery 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 299 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Commander engine produces 68 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Due to the lower power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.8 | 15.0 | |
| Jeep Commander consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Jeep Commander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Grand Cherokee | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller. Jeep Commander is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |