Jeep Commander 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 303 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Commander engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 5 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 13.5 | |
| Jeep Commander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher. Jeep Commander is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Commander is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Commander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |