Jeep Commander 2006 vs Land Rover Discovery 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 303 HP | 299 HP | |
| Torque: | 445 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 4 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Despite the higher power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 15.0 | |
|
The Jeep Commander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Commander consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Jeep Commander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Commander is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Commander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1192 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 3`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |