Jeep Commander 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Commander engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 190 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite less power, Jeep Commander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 11.5 | |
| Jeep Commander consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Jeep Commander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher. Jeep Commander is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Commander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 212 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 401 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 103 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Commander is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Commander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |