Jeep Commander 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 11.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Commander consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Commander could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Commander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is smaller, but higher. Jeep Commander is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Commander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 170 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 443 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`812 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |