Jeep Commander 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Commander engine produces 12 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Commander is larger. Jeep Commander is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Commander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jeep Commander has 808 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Jeep Commander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`905 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Commander has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |