Jaguar X-Type 2003 vs SAAB 9-3 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 80 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, but torque is 30 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar X-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Jaguar X-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar X-Type consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is larger, but lower. Jaguar X-Type is 3 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |