Jaguar X-Type 2003 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 226 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 275 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar X-Type engine produces 96 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, but torque is 55 NM more than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Jaguar X-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 12.5 | |
The Jaguar X-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar X-Type consumes 6.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Jaguar X-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1035 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
1350 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar X-Type is 5 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar X-Type is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
452 litres | no data | |
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space. Jaguar X-Type has 48 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar X-Type is 0.8 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Jaguar X-Type can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`020 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar X-Type has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |