Jaguar XKR 1998 vs Ford Cougar 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Jaguar XKR is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Cougar has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Jaguar XKR is available with rear wheel drive, while Ford Cougar can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 4.0 - 4.2 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 363 - 395 HP | 130 - 205 HP | |
Torque: | 505 - 540 NM | 176 - 234 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 12.5 | 8.3 - 10.2 | |
Jaguar XKR petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Cougar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
Jaguar XKR is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XKR is 6 cm longer than the Ford Cougar, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XKR is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
Ford Cougar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XKR has 103 litres less trunk space than the Ford Cougar. This could mean that the Jaguar XKR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`057 | ~ 1`799 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9200 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XKR has
|
Ford Cougar has
| |