Jaguar XKR 1998 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 4.2 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 363 - 395 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 505 - 540 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 12.5 | 10.0 | |
|
Jaguar XKR petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Jaguar XKR is smaller. Jaguar XKR is 16 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 327 litres | 923 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Jaguar XKR has 596 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`057 | ~ 1`872 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |