Jaguar XK 2011 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Jaguar XK is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Camaro has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 5.0 | 2.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 385 - 550 HP | 238 - 650 HP | |
Torque: | 515 - 680 NM | 365 - 868 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 5.5 seconds | 4.2 - 5.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 12.3 | 8.2 - 15.7 | |
Jaguar XK petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.35 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XK is 1 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XK is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 257 litres | |
Jaguar XK has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XK has 73 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XK is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Jaguar XK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`122 | ~ 1`690 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XK has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |