Jaguar XJS 1991 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 6.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 226 - 318 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 471 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 8.2 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 14.9 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
|
Jaguar XJS petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.25 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Jaguar XJS is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJS is 30 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJS is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJS has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJS has 100 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJS is 3.4 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Jaguar XJS can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`139 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJS has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |