Jaguar XJR 2017 vs Lexus GS 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar XJR
2017 -
Lexus GS
2015 -
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Jaguar XJR is available only with rear wheel drive, while Lexus GS can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 5.0 (petrol)2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 575 HP181 - 477 HP
Torque: 700 NM221 - 530 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 seconds4.6 - 9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.14.4 - 12.3
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus GS.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.13 m4.88 m
Width: 1.90 m1.84 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Jaguar XJR is larger.
Jaguar XJR is 25 cm longer than the Lexus GS, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres458 litres
Jaguar XJR has more luggage capacity.
Jaguar XJR has 62 litres more trunk space than the Lexus GS.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJR is 0.8 metres more than that of the Lexus GS, which means Jaguar XJR can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`800~ 2`259
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data23 400
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XJR has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
Lexus GS has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv