Jaguar XJR 2017 vs Chrysler 300C 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJR is available only with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler 300C can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 5.0 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 575 HP | 286 - 476 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 340 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.2 - 13.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XJR is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XJR is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 462 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJR has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJR has 58 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJR has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |