Jaguar XJR 2017 vs Lexus LS 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJR is available only with rear wheel drive, while Lexus LS can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 5.0 | 3.4 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 575 HP | 315 - 421 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 380 - 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 seconds | 4.6 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.6 - 9.9 | |
|
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus LS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJR is smaller, but slightly higher. Jaguar XJR is 11 cm shorter than the Lexus LS, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XJR is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJR has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar XJR has 40 litres more trunk space than the Lexus LS. The Lexus LS may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 2`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJR has
|
Lexus LS has
| |