Jaguar XJ6 1994 vs Chrysler Concorde 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ6 engine produces 56 HP more power than Chrysler Concorde, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Chrysler Concorde. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 66 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Concorde) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ6) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ6 is smaller. Jaguar XJ6 is 15 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ6 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 473 litres | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage space. Jaguar XJ6 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Concorde. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ6 has
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |