Jaguar XJ 1989 vs BMW 5 series 1992

 
Jaguar XJ
1989 - 1993
BMW 5 series
1992 - 1995
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.0 Petrol4.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 226 HP286 HP
Torque: 377 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds6.8 seconds
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving.
Jaguar XJ engine produces 60 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 23 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.912.0
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jaguar XJ consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 86 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.99 m4.72 m
Width: 1.79 m1.75 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower.
Jaguar XJ is 27 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data460 litres
Turning diameter: 12.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.4 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5002`160
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 52003600
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XJ has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv