Jaguar XJ 1986 vs BMW 3 series 1987

 
Jaguar XJ
1986 - 1989
BMW 3 series
1987 - 1991
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 203 HP113 HP
Torque: 302 NM162 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds11 seconds
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive.
Jaguar XJ engine produces 90 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 140 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.88.5
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jaguar XJ consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 495 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 89 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.99 m4.32 m
Width: 1.79 m1.64 m
Height: 1.38 m1.38 m
Jaguar XJ is larger.
Jaguar XJ is 67 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data425 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data425 litres
Turning diameter: 12.4 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.4 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`545
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 52004200
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XJ has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv