Jaguar XJ 1990 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo 960, but torque is 31 NM more than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XJ consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XJ consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 12 cm longer than the Volvo 960, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |