Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Opel Omega 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 50 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.4 | |
| Jaguar XJ consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 25 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.5 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Opel Omega has
| |