Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Volvo 940 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 68 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo 940. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 7.5 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 12 cm longer than the Volvo 940, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |