Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Volvo S90 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 39 HP more power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Volvo S90. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.7 | |
| Jaguar XJ consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S90, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |