Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 12.6 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.39 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 20 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.7 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |